Home / Tech News / Online giants must bolster free speech against abuse, or watch innovation die

Online giants must bolster free speech against abuse, or watch innovation die

When thousands, perhaps millions, of people use social networks to spread hate speech, online harassment and abuse, the problem might often seem insurmountable. But whatever approaches are being used to address the problem, something, somewhere is clearly not working. YouTube videos by extremists and terrorists abound. Targeted harassment and trolling on Twitter remains to this day, years and years after you might reasonably have thought they might get it right. Facebook almost automatically removes women who breast feed their children and yet seems to shrug its shoulders over fake news, which might move an entire election, spreading on its network.

It’s no wonder politicians feel justified in saying enough is enough.

The news last week that the German government had proposed fining Facebook and Twitter up to $53m (€50m) for failing to remove abuse, slander, fake news and hate speech within 24 hours once again threw into sharp relief the differences in attitudes between Europe and the US to online content. If followed through, such a law would make it the most draconian clampdown by a European country on an online network.

In the US, freedom of speech — any speech — is sacrosanct. In Europe, which experienced genuine fascism and extreme politics in its relatively recent history, hate speech is usually recognised in law and has long-defined sanctions on those who spread it.

The German government bill, introduced by interior minister Heiko Maas, will be designed to “combat hate crime and criminal offences on social networks more effectively,” and would cover “defamation, slander, public prosecution, crimes and threats.”

“Too little criminal content is being deleted, and it’s not being deleted sufficiently quickly,” he told journalists. “The biggest problem is and remains that the networks don’t take the complaints of their own users seriously enough,” he added. Germany also has long been pressuring US tech companies to more aggressively combat hate material and ‘fake news’.

Social networks would be obliged to delete “obvious” criminal content inside 24 hours, and across an entire platform, not just a single instance of the content. Other criminal content would have to be blocked or deleted within a week and companies would have to inform complainants of any decision. Companies would also have to publish quarterly reports on the complaints in terms of number, how the complaints were handled and staffing of their complaints team. Failure to comply would mean a €5m fine against the individual responsible, and up to €50m against the company.

If a company takes issue with the execution of the law, the issue would go to the German courts for deliberation. Maas has also suggested that Facebook should be treated as a media company under German law.

It’s not an idle threat. Germany’s interior ministry not only published an explanation of the draft law, Maas also published a fuller explanation of the law and gave a speech on the issue. He said “freedom of expression also protects repulsive and ugly utterances … Even a lie can be covered by freedom of expression. But freedom of expression ends where criminal law begins.” He argues that “verbal radicalization is often the precursor to physical violence.” Let’s face it, Germany should know.

In Germany it is illegal to promote Nazi ideology (or to deny the Holocaust) and many tech companies have previously agreed to work with the German officials to remove xenophobic and racist messages.

Maas’s point is that social networks are not ‘dumb’ carriers of content, but are equally responsible if their platform “is abused to spread criminal hate.”

In his pronouncements, Maas referenced a new report by the Jugendschutz organisation, a youth protection watchdog, which showed that social platforms were often achingly slow to act on hate speech, and ineffectual in deletions. It said social networks including Twitter, Facebook and YouTube are removing only a small portion of the criminal content reported to them by their one users. The report said that Twitter removed only 1% of content reported to it as criminal within 24 hours; Facebook deleted 39%; and YouTube removed 90% of user-reported criminal content and 82% of the deletions occurred 24 hours after the notification. The German government is going to set a target of 70%.

The appallingly slow rate of deletion of hate speech on these networks shows either that these networks do not take the complaints of their own users seriously enough, or that the problem of sifting through billions of posts a day is far larger than any of the companies can deal with. Whatever the case, the practical realities are that they must at least be seen to be trying.

But the tech giants are either saying nothing, or fighting back.

Facebook disputes the result of the Jugendschutz report. It pointed to another report from the FSM organisation which found 65% of illegal content was removed from Facebook within 24 hours, and overall it had a deletion rate of 80%.)

And in it’s defence, Facebook said that, by the end of 2017, it will have more than 700 employees working with content moderation partner Arvato, based in Berlin. It’s also been piloting measures to fight fake news in Germany since January, working with local third-party fact-checking organization Correctiv to try to identify and flag dubious content.

Against these findings, Google’s YouTube is looking much better. And admittedly, it may be easier to discern problematic content from video instead of text. But it is far easier to take down content when it’s being matched to a database or, say, copyrighted material, than when you have to determine whether something is hate speech.

Twitter is not commenting on the proposed draft law, but, independently, has made recent moves to try to address the problems of hate speech on its network. This includes: Identifying abusive accounts; adding extra filtering options; identifying persistent abusers and preventing them from opening new accounts; and creating a “safe search” option.

The matter is not going to stop in Germany, however. The government intends to build a Europe-wide consensus on dealing with abusive and criminal content on social networks, and take its fight EU-wide.

And the idea seems to be spreading. British Conservative MP Tim Loughton, a member of the powerful Home Affairs Select Committee, heavily criticised the “woeful” excuses by the UK heads of Google, Twitter and Facebook to MPs in a gruelling three-hour grilling in the House of Commons. He said it defied belief that they could make billions from online advertising but do so little to protect the public from the effects of online abuse.

In particular, Facebook has come under fire in the UK after a BBC investigation found secret Facebook groups being used to share child abuse imagery. (And it didn’t exactly cover itself in glory when it reported the journalists who found the content to the police).

“German proposals for proactive fines must be the way for us to go if these companies cannot clean up their act,” Loughton said.

In other moves, the European Commission is threatening to fine Facebook, Twitter, Google and other social networks unless they overhaul their terms and conditions to “comply with EU consumer rules.” It could be just the first wave of moves which may go on to address the content they also carry on their platforms.

Indeed, they’ve already started. In May last year, the European Commission set forth an anti-hate speech code of conduct, and it enlisted Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Microsoft to take part in the fight. This was after moves in 2015 which saw Facebook, Google and Microsoft agree to a voluntary code of conduct in Europe to fight the spread of hate speech online. It’s not like any of this is a surprise to them.

And let’s not be naive: The laws Germany is proposing are not suddenly being dreamt up in a vacuum.

Seeing the effects of how fake news may have influenced the US election to favour a demagogic populist like Donald Trump, there is huge concern in German political circles about the potential influence fake news and hate speech could have on the country’s federal elections later this year.

Angela Merkel’s ruling conservatives are facing a strong challenge from the populist, anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AFD), which has effectively used social networks to get across many of its more extremist and intolerant ideas.

Hate speech is on the rise on social networks in Germany after Mrs Merkel allowed in a million refugees fleeing civil war and economic impoverishment in the Middle East and North Africa.

And an increasing number of policy makers in Europe, the United States and elsewhere, argue that social media companies have a responsibility to block harmful content and respect national rules.

But the implications are obvious. An EU-wide, or even global regulatory push would end up limiting how individuals communicated online and allow governments to exert control over the content on social media.

Working out what exactly is hate speech and what might be, for instance, simple democratic opposition to a differing point of view, is a complex issue. As the phrase goes, one man’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter.

There are no easy answers.

But Mark Zuckerberg cannot seriously say one the one hand that Facebook could not do anything to stop fake news spreading, when it can do plenty to serve us targeted advertising based on our interactions with the platform. The two notions are just not compatible.

A way out may be to give users far more control to weed out the hate speech themselves, with AI-driven algorithms applied to the problem. In the background, however, lurks a dark question for the social networks — if their platforms become fluffier and more soporific, will their traffic, engagement and therefore revenues go down? There can be no doubt that this question will have been raised at some point, even in the rarefied atmosphere of Facebook’s inner circle.

Whatever the case, until the problem is better addressed, politicians and governments will continue to come up with largely unworkable solutions like fines, so long these huge social platforms look like they are sitting on their hands.

Asking private sector companies to police their networks is a double-edged sword. Like the disappearing breast-feeders, if faced with a huge fine for allowing an instance of hate speech on its network, social networks would be more likely to ‘delete first and ask questions later’ since deleting content in the first place (whether incorrectly or not) is a lot cheaper than getting the legal position wrong, and hence fined.

And if democratic governments get to police online content, they will likely end up being heavy-handed also. Plus, that policy will give succour to all those tin-pot dictatorships around the world, who will enjoy seeing democracies turn to their own methods of censorship.

We can all agree however that, yes, platforms need to allow for free speech, but not to the point where extremism and misinformation drowns out the truth.

What is as stake here? The freedoms and rights enjoyed by companies which organically developed in democratic countries could well end up being eroded. How many global, truly innovative tech companies (not counting clones) have come out of Putin’s Russia, or Erdogan’s Turkey? Tech innovation depends on free, democratic societies. The Enlightenment of the 19th Century was only possible when freedom of thought was able to flourish. It did not emerge from the fug of the Dark Ages, where conspiracy and superstition abounded (not unlike the fake news era of today).

To not put in place a mechanism where abuse and untruths smother science and factual reporting is to put at stake any progression in innovation and entrepreneurialism. It is surely in the interests of the giant online and social platforms to pay attention to the erosion of trust in genuine media sources and professional journalism. Without it, the rights and freedoms they enjoy under democracy, and from who’s breast they themselves were succoured, will likely disappear, and populist politicians will take advantage of a misinformed and inflamed public discourse to the detriment of a free society.

Featured Image: Bryce Durbin

Source link

About admin

Check Also


TransferWise moves into Asia Pacific with opening of regional HQ in Singapore

TransferWise, the billion-dollar valued startup that reduces the cost of cross-border payments, has taken a big ...


  1. Hi there! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if that would be okay. I’m absolutely enjoying your blog and look forward to new updates.|

  2. Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this site. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s very hard to get that “perfect balance” between usability and visual appeal. I must say you’ve done a superb job with this. Additionally, the blog loads extremely fast for me on Opera. Exceptional Blog!|

  3. whoah this weblog is magnificent i like studying your posts. Keep up the great work! You realize, lots of individuals are looking around for this information, you can aid them greatly. |

  4. Thank you for the auspicious writeup. It in fact was a amusement account it. Look advanced to far added agreeable from you! By the way, how could we communicate?|

  5. I don’t know if it’s just me or if everyone else encountering issues with your blog. It appears as though some of the text on your posts are running off the screen. Can somebody else please comment and let me know if this is happening to them as well? This might be a issue with my internet browser because I’ve had this happen previously. Thanks|

  6. The other day, while I was at work, my cousin stole my apple ipad and tested to see if it can survive a twenty five foot drop, just so she can be a youtube sensation. My iPad is now destroyed and she has 83 views. I know this is entirely off topic but I had to share it with someone!|

  7. Have you ever thought about writing an ebook or guest authoring on other blogs? I have a blog centered on the same information you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information. I know my subscribers would enjoy your work. If you are even remotely interested, feel free to shoot me an email.|

  8. Spot on with this write-up, I truly believe that this web site needs far more attention. I’ll probably be back again to read more, thanks for the advice!|

  9. This is a topic which is close to my heart… Thank you! Where are your contact details though?|

  10. This design is spectacular! You most certainly know how to keep a
    reader entertained. Between your wit and your videos, I was almost moved to start my own blog (well,
    almost…HaHa!) Excellent job. I really enjoyed what you had to say, and
    more than that, how you presented it. Too cool!

  11. Hi, I do think this is a great blog. I stumbledupon it 😉 I
    am going to return yet again since I book-marked it. Money and freedom is the best way to change, may you be rich and continue to help others.

  12. Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your
    articles? I mean, what you say is important and everything.
    Nevertheless imagine if you added some great visuals or videos to give your posts more, “pop”!
    Your content is excellent but with pics and videos, this site could definitely be one of the very best in its field.

    Wonderful blog!

    My page – csgo skins sites

  13. Hello! I’ve been reading your weblog for a long time now
    and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Humble
    Tx! Just wanted to say keep up the great work!

    Also visit my blog post – madden mobile unlimited coins no survey no download (thelincolnagency.com)

  14. This is a topic that is close to my heart… Thank you!
    Where are your contact details though?

    Feel free to visit my website; mink lash strips wholesale

  15. This post is worth everyone’s attention. How can I find
    out more?

    Stop by my web-site :: csgo skins price drop (https://www.cubenta.com/user/profile/12146)

  16. I absolutely love your blog.. Pleasant colors & theme.
    Did you create this website yourself? Please reply back as I’m
    hoping to create my very own blog and would like to
    find out where you got this from or exactly what the theme is
    called. Cheers!

    Here is my web page – cs go weapon skins steam

  17. Hi, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues.

    When I look at your blog in Safari, it looks fine but when opening
    in Internet Explorer, it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give
    you a quick heads up! Other then that, superb blog!

    Look at my page counter strike go skin trade

  18. Thank you for some other fantastic article. Where else
    may just anybody get that kind of information in such an ideal approach of writing?

    I have a presentation next week, and I am at the search for such

    My blog post … fifa 17 coins xbox one ebay

  19. Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all people you really
    know what you’re speaking about! Bookmarked. Kindly additionally
    seek advice from my web site =). We could have a hyperlink alternate arrangement
    among us

    Feel free to surf to my webpage … mink strip eyelashes australia

  20. Definitely believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason seemed to be on the net the simplest thing to be aware of.
    I say to you, I certainly get irked while people think about
    worries that they plainly do not know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top as well as defined
    out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal.
    Will probably be back to get more. Thanks

    Feel free to surf to my web page :: cs go skins steam workshop (http://www.griffithzone.com)

  21. Heya! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with hackers?
    My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing months of hard work due to no
    back up. Do you have any solutions to prevent hackers?

    my blog :: http://carolbella.soclog.se

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>